Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is slightly better than the Motorola razr (2022), getting an 89 score against 81.1. Galaxy Note10's body is lighter than Motorola razr (2022), although it is a bit thicker and was released many years before. Motorola razr (2022) counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10. They have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2022) features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a bit lower pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger display. The Motorola razr (2022) captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a much smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note10's battery life is very similar to Motorola razr (2022)'s battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.