Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| -- | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is better than Motorola razr (2022)'s 81.1 global score. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy S20 is incredibly older and just a little thicker than Motorola razr (2022), it's construction is still somewhat lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version and Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version.
Motorola razr (2022) has just a little better performance than Galaxy S20, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy S20 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel count in each display inch and a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
The Motorola razr (2022) takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with higher 30 fps video frame rates and a lot more MP back camera. Galaxy S20 has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy S20 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.