Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than Motorola razr (2022)'s 81.1 score. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version. Even though Galaxy S20 FE is older and just a bit thicker than the Motorola razr (2022), it's construction is still a little lighter.
Motorola razr (2022) features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE and Motorola razr (2022) count with similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a superior memory to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 29 percent greater battery capacity.
Motorola razr (2022) features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.