Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, getting an 81.1 score against 78.1. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2022) has the older 12 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2 version. Motorola razr (2022)'s construction is a lot newer and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus's, although it's also noticeably heavier.
The Motorola razr (2022) has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM memory. The Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a brighter screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density.
Motorola razr (2022) shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Motorola razr (2022) has a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola razr (2022) features longer battery performance than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.