Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 5.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2022) has a score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 score. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but Motorola razr (2022) has older 12 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Motorola razr (2022) is a incredibly newer and thinner phone than the Galaxy S5 Sport, although it's extremely heavier.
Motorola razr (2022) features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much better display than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Motorola razr (2022) captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a back facing camera with way more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture. The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola razr (2022) features longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.