Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) is a bit better than the Galaxy S7, getting a score of 81.1 against 79.5. The Motorola razr (2022) body is a lot newer and just a little bit thinner, but noticeably heavier than the Galaxy S7. The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a larger number of cores and 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S7 counts with a better looking display than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Motorola razr (2022) has a quite bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Motorola razr (2022) has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola razr (2022) features a better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.