Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) has a global score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's overall score of 80.1. Motorola razr (2022)'s body is extremely newer, notably lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2022) has an older 12 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Motorola razr (2022) has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with greater battery life than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Motorola razr (2022) features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.