Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2022), getting a overall score of 88.5 against 81.1. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 12 operating system. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's body is a little thinner and a bit lighter than the Motorola razr (2022), even though it was released many years before.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little better display pixels density. The Galaxy Z Flip features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores. Motorola razr (2022) takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a much more MP camera.
The Motorola razr (2022) features just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.