Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than the Motorola razr (2022)'s global score of 81.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an noticeably older phone than Motorola razr (2022), but Samsung made it just a bit thinner and a little lighter anyway. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version and Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little sharper display than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a quite better 1080 x 2636px resolution and a quite greater display pixel density. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G's processing unit is very similar to Motorola razr (2022)'s processing unit, both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 6% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.