Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Motorola razr (2022), with a 94.6 score against 81.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is an older and noticeably heavier phone than the Motorola razr (2022), but Samsung was able to build it just a bit thinner anyway. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Motorola razr (2022) both count with very similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 4 GB more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola razr (2022) has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bit better screen pixels density.
Motorola razr (2022) captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has improved battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.