Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| -- | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Motorola razr (2022), having a 90.6 score against 81.1. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is thinner than the Motorola razr (2022), although it's notably heavier and was released just 12 months before.
The Motorola razr (2022) features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola razr (2022) has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixels count in each display inch.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features better battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 26% greater battery capacity. Motorola razr (2022) features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.