Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2022) is slightly better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, with a overall score of 81.1 against 76.1. The Motorola razr (2022) body is newer and somewhat thinner than TCL 20 Pro 5G's, although it's a little bit heavier. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2022) has a newer 12 version while TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit sharper display than TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both of them have a same size screen, a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and the same 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Motorola razr (2022) has a little bit better performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a greater amount of RAM.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. TCL 20 Pro 5G captures clearer photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and video.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with greater battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.