Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.1 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.33 x 2.32 x 0.43 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.2 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 720 x 480 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1785mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is way better than Motorola RAZR D1, getting an 83.3 score against 47.9. The Galaxy S9 construction is way thinner but heavier than Motorola RAZR D1. The Galaxy S9 features a very superior CPU than Motorola RAZR D1, because it has a greater number of cores. The Galaxy S9 counts with a much better screen than Motorola RAZR D1, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px, a lot better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a lot larger screen.
The Galaxy S9 has a very superior camera than Motorola RAZR D1, because it has a back camera with a way higher 12 megapixels resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much better memory to install applications and games than Motorola RAZR D1, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB.
Galaxy S9 has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola RAZR D1, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1785mAh.
The Galaxy S9 costs a little more than the Motorola RAZR D1, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.