Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.1 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.70 x 2.35 x 0.39 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6577 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX531 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is a lot better than Motorola RAZR D3, with a global score of 83.3 against 56.9. The Galaxy S9 is a thinner but noticeably heavier phone than Motorola RAZR D3. Galaxy S9 has a much better screen than Motorola RAZR D3, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels, a lot larger screen and a lot higher number of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy S9 features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Motorola RAZR D3, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 400 GB and 64 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S9 counts with a quite superior performance than Motorola RAZR D3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a way better camera than Motorola RAZR D3, because it has a much higher resolution camera and a way higher (4K) video quality. The Galaxy S9 has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola RAZR D3, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S9 costs a little more than the Motorola RAZR D3, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.