Compare phones
Motorola RAZR HD
XT925| Global Score | |
| 64.5 | 70.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.0.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-09-05 | 2019-11-05 |
| 5.19 x 2.67 x 0.33 inches | 9.73 x 5.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 17.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 240.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.26 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2530mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG G Pad 5 is just a bit better than the Motorola RAZR HD, with a 70.8 score against 64.5. Even though the LG G Pad 5 is notably heavier than the Motorola RAZR HD, it's a little thinner and also newer. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but LG G Pad 5 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Motorola RAZR HD has Android 4.0.4 version, giving some nice extra features and optimized performance.
LG G Pad 5 counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola RAZR HD, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Motorola RAZR HD features a better screen than LG G Pad 5, because although it has a lot worse 1280 x 720 pixels resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen.
LG G Pad 5 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola RAZR HD. Both have the same video frame rates, the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same resolution back facing camera. LG G Pad 5 counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Motorola RAZR HD, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG G Pad 5 has a much better battery performance than Motorola RAZR HD, because it has 8200mAh of battery capacity against 2530mAh.
LG G Pad 5 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.