Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.0.4 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2012-09-05 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.19 x 2.67 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2530mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 is much better than Motorola RAZR HD, getting a general score of 77.6 against 64.5. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Moto Z3 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola RAZR HD has Android 4.0.4. Moto Z3 is a much newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Motorola RAZR HD, although it's a little bit heavier.
Motorola RAZR HD has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z3, although it has a bit inferior pixels quantity per inch of screen, a much smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels. The Moto Z3 counts with a quite better performance than Motorola RAZR HD, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and 3 GB more RAM.
The Moto Z3 shoots greater photographs and videos than Motorola RAZR HD, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low light situations, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with much more MP. The Moto Z3 has a very superior memory for games and applications than Motorola RAZR HD, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 48 GB more internal storage.
Moto Z3 has superior battery lifetime than Motorola RAZR HD, because it has a 19% bigger battery capacity.
Moto Z3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.