Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.5 | 71 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 4.0.4 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2012-09-05 | 2016-07-24 |
| 5.19 x 2.67 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.11 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 192.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-T860 MP2 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 7.16 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 21.50 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.26 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2530mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XA Ultra has a global score of 71, which is just a bit better than the Motorola RAZR HD's general score of 64.5. Sony Xperia XA Ultra's construction has the same thickness than Motorola RAZR HD, but it is much heavier. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Sony Xperia XA Ultra has newer 7.0 Nougat version while Motorola RAZR HD has Android 4.0.4 version, providing you some nice extra features.
Motorola RAZR HD has a slightly better screen than Xperia XA Ultra, although it has a lot smaller screen, a lot worse 1280 x 720 pixels resolution and a just a little lower screen density. Xperia XA Ultra features a much greater memory for games and applications than Motorola RAZR HD, and although they both have equal 16 GB internal memory capacity, the Xperia XA Ultra also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 200 GB.
Xperia XA Ultra features a little better performance than Motorola RAZR HD, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). Xperia XA Ultra has a little better battery performance than Motorola RAZR HD, because it has 2700mAh of battery capacity against 2530mAh.
Xperia XA Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Motorola RAZR HD, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Xperia XA Ultra also has a larger camera aperture and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Sony Xperia XA Ultra is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.