Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-09-05 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.19 x 2.67 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2530mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is a lot better than the Motorola RAZR HD's 64.5 general score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version and Motorola RAZR HD has Android 4.0.4 version. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is notably newer than Motorola RAZR HD, it's much heavier and a bit thicker.
Motorola RAZR HD has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a little worse pixels amount in each inch of screen, a lot smaller display and a much lower 1280 x 720 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola RAZR HD, because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a superior processor than Motorola RAZR HD, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and 6 more cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Motorola RAZR HD, because it has a 98% more battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots way better photographs and videos than Motorola RAZR HD, because it has a lot higher resolution camera, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a lot bigger aperture for better captures in low light environments.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also cheap compared to the Motorola RAZR HD, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.