Compare phones
Motorola RAZR M
XT905| Global Score | |
| 58.9 | 63.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-09-05 | 2020-05-29 |
| 4.82 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches | 5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Tempered blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 130.00 | $ 110.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Advanced | IPS LCD |
| 256 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Helio A22 MT6761 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8300 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.27 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia C2 Tava has a score of 63.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola RAZR M's 58.9 global score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Nokia C2 Tava has 10 version while Motorola RAZR M has Android 4.4.2. Nokia C2 Tava is a extremely newer cellphone than the Motorola RAZR M, but it's noticeably heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Nokia C2 Tava counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola RAZR M, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola RAZR M features a little sharper display than Nokia C2 Tava, although it has a way smaller display, a just a bit worse display pixels density and a way worse 960 x 540 pixels resolution.
The Nokia C2 Tava features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola RAZR M, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB. The Nokia C2 Tava captures much better pictures and videos than Motorola RAZR M. Both of them have a same resolution camera, the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality.
The Nokia C2 Tava features a really longer battery life than Motorola RAZR M, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Nokia C2 Tava is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.