Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-09-05 | 2016-03-11 |
| 4.82 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Advanced | Super AMOLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is way better than the Motorola RAZR M, having a overall score of 79.5 against 58.9. The Galaxy S7 construction is a lot newer and a bit thinner, but also heavier than Motorola RAZR M. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a little better performance than Motorola RAZR M, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Galaxy S7 counts with a lot better looking screen than Motorola RAZR M, because it has a much greater screen density, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola RAZR M, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 200 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a way better camera than Motorola RAZR M, because it has a much higher resolution camera and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a really longer battery performance than Motorola RAZR M, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
The Galaxy S7 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola RAZR M.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.