Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62 | 68.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.0, 2.3.6 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2012-04-03 | 2018-07-09 |
| 5.15 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches | 5.62 x 2.76 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Kevlar | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 125.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 256 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Mali-T720 MP1 GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 8.04 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.25 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 607 hours standby time 17.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3 has a score of 68.7, which is better than the Motorola RAZR MAXX's 62 score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3 has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola RAZR MAXX has Android 4.0 version, so it counts with some additional features. Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3's body has the same thickness than the Motorola RAZR MAXX, but it's just a little heavier.
The Motorola RAZR MAXX counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, although it has a little worse pixels count per inch in the display, a way worse 960 x 540 resolution and a bit smaller screen. The Galaxy Amp Prime 3 has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola RAZR MAXX, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy Amp Prime 3 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 400 GB.
Galaxy Amp Prime 3 counts with a processor that is just as good as the Motorola RAZR MAXX one, because although the Galaxy Amp Prime 3 has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. Motorola RAZR MAXX counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Galaxy Amp Prime 3 has a bit better camera than Motorola RAZR MAXX, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy Amp Prime 3 also has a much bigger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3 costs a little more money than Motorola RAZR MAXX, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.