Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.0, 2.3.6 | -- |
| 2012-04-03 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.15 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Kevlar | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 607 hours standby time 17.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is much better than Motorola RAZR MAXX, with a 79.5 score against 62. Galaxy S7's body is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than Motorola RAZR MAXX's, although it's also a little bit heavier. The Galaxy S7 features a bit better CPU than Motorola RAZR MAXX, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and 3 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S7 features an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola RAZR MAXX, because it has a larger screen, a lot better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a way higher screen density. The Galaxy S7 features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola RAZR MAXX, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that allows up to 200 GB.
The Galaxy S7 has a much better camera than Motorola RAZR MAXX, because it has a lot more MP back camera, a lot larger aperture for better photography and video in low light environments and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Motorola RAZR MAXX has just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola RAZR MAXX.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.