Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 413 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is better than the Motorola razr Plus (2024)'s 75.7 score. Motorola razr Plus (2024) has a much better display than LG Velvet, because it has a bit larger screen, a little higher 1080 x 2640 resolution and a quite higher display pixel density. The LG Velvet has a very superior CPU than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
LG Velvet has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because it has a 13% greater battery size.
LG Velvet features a lot better camera than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.