Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-02-25 |
| -- | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 413 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is just a bit better than Motorola razr Plus (2024), getting a overall score of 82 against 75.7. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has an older 11 version while Motorola razr Plus (2024) has Android 14 version. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with 8 more cpu cores.
The Motorola razr Plus (2024) features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2640 pixels, a little bigger display, a just a bit higher screen pixel density and a way brighter display. Galaxy A32 LTE Only takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a back camera with lot more MP.
Motorola razr Plus (2024) counts with a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features improved battery lifetime than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.