Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-01-13 |
| -- | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.61 ounces |
| -- | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 413 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.76 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A5 (2017) is just a bit better than Motorola razr Plus (2024), having a 75.8 score against 75.7. The Motorola razr Plus (2024) features a sharper screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a quite lower screen density, it also counts with a way bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2640 pixels resolution.
Motorola razr Plus (2024) has a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A5 (2017) features a much faster processing unit than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
Motorola razr Plus (2024) features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 27% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy A5 (2017) takes a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A5 (2017) also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.