Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 413 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is much better than Motorola razr Plus (2024), having an 85.5 score against 75.7. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has older 11 version while Motorola razr Plus (2024) has Android 14 version. The Galaxy A51 features a much powerful CPU than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The Motorola razr Plus (2024) counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a quite larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2640px. The Samsung Galaxy A51 shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Galaxy A51 has a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A51 features a little better battery life than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.