Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-29 |
| -- | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 413 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Motorola razr Plus (2024), with a 90.8 score against 75.7. These devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola razr Plus (2024) has Android 14 version. Motorola razr Plus (2024) features a much better display than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2640 pixels and a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy A51 5G features a better storage for applications and games than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a greater camera than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot better 48 MP resolution back facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better battery duration than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.