Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 413 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is better than the Motorola razr Plus (2024)'s 75.7 score. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores. Motorola razr Plus (2024) has a much better looking display than Galaxy A52, because it has a little higher 1080 x 2640 resolution, a little higher pixels density and a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A52 takes way better photographs and videos than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a better memory to install games and applications than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.