Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| -- | 4.06 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 413 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 5.76 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Alpha has an overall score of 76.3, which is just a bit better than the Motorola razr Plus (2024)'s score of 75.7. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Alpha has a newer 4.4.4 version and Motorola razr Plus (2024) has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy Alpha features a way better hardware performance than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processor and a larger number of cores (and faster).
The Motorola razr Plus (2024) features a slightly better screen than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a higher pixels amount in each inch in the display, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2640 and a way larger display. The Samsung Galaxy Alpha captures clearer photographs and videos than Motorola razr Plus (2024), although it has worse video frame rate, they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola razr Plus (2024) counts with a much bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Motorola razr Plus (2024) has a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 104% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.