Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| -- | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 413 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.76 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is just a bit better than the Motorola razr Plus (2024), having a general score of 79.3 against 75.7. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version while Motorola razr Plus (2024) has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has just a bit better looking display than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels number per inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Motorola razr Plus (2024) has much more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola razr Plus (2024) features improved battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 3800mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 takes much better photos and videos than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 also counts with a camera with a lot higher 16 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.