Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.78 ounces |
| -- | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 413 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is way better than the Motorola razr Plus (2024), having a 94.8 score against 75.7. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version and Motorola razr Plus (2024) has Android 14. The Galaxy S20 counts with a much better performance than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because it has a larger number of cores and 4 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola razr Plus (2024) counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a lot worse pixel quantity per inch of screen and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2640px, it also counts with a quite larger display. Samsung Galaxy S20 features a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 has a little longer battery duration than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3800mAh. Galaxy S20 captures greater pictures and videos than Motorola razr Plus (2024), and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels, the Galaxy S20 also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.