Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 413 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is better than Motorola razr Plus (2024)'s 75.7 overall score. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version and Motorola razr Plus (2024) has Android 14. Motorola razr Plus (2024) has a more vivid screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a just a little higher display pixels density, a slightly higher 1080 x 2640px resolution and a little bit bigger display.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores. The Galaxy S20 FE features more memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S20 FE has a better camera than Motorola razr Plus (2024). Both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rates and a 12 mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.