Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| -- | 2014-06-23 |
| -- | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 413 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.76 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a little bit better than the Motorola razr Plus (2024), with a score of 77.8 against 75.7. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has newer 4.4.2 version while Motorola razr Plus (2024) has Android 14 version. Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a display that is very similar to the screen in Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although the Galaxy S5 Sport has a much smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels amount per inch of screen.
Motorola razr Plus (2024) counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU and a higher number of cores.
The Motorola razr Plus (2024) features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 3800mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Galaxy S5 Sport shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a much higher 16 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.