Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| -- | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| -- | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 413 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is a bit better than Motorola razr Plus (2024)'s score of 75.7. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola razr Plus (2024) has Android 14, so it counts with a couple nice extra features.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much powerful CPU than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. Motorola razr Plus (2024) counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much worse pixel amount per inch in the display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2640px, it also counts with a lot larger screen.
The Motorola razr Plus (2024) captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Motorola razr Plus (2024) also has a way higher (4K) video quality. Motorola razr Plus (2024) features a better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit superior battery life than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because it has an 18 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.