Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-07 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 413 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is slightly better than the Motorola razr Plus (2024), getting a 79 score against 75.7. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the older 11 version and Motorola razr Plus (2024) has Android 14. Motorola razr Plus (2024) counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2640, a little higher number of pixels in each display inch and a quite bigger display.
The Motorola razr Plus (2024) has a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a really superior performance than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with more processing cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has greater battery life than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3800mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.