Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 15 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-04-24 |
| -- | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| -- | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| -- | 326 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2020) is slightly better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having a global score of 81.5 against 79.2. IPhone SE (2020) has iOS 15.x OS, while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 OS. The iPhone SE (2020) counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has 13 GB less RAM and 2 less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a way better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lot smaller screen and much darker display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than iPhone SE (2020), because it has more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better battery lifetime than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a better camera than iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a much better 50 MP resolution camera and a way better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.