Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 15 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-06-01 |
| -- | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| -- | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| -- | 563 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with an 81 score against 79.2. These devices include Android OS, but the LG G7 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version, so it offers lots of additional features. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen and much less brightness.
LG G7 ThinQ has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 57 percent more battery size. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots much better photographs and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, it also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.