Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 15 | Android 5.1 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2015-10-01 |
| -- | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 7.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than LG V10, with a 79.2 score against 78.6. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s construction is much newer and noticeably thinner, but a bit heavier than the LG V10. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has 15 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1, giving you some additional features and performance improvements.
The LG V10 features a really superior performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores. LG V10 has a much sharper screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures much better photos and videos than LG V10, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a back camera with a much better resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior storage for apps and games than LG V10, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a really longer battery life than LG V10, because it has a 57 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.