Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6 inches |
| -- | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | P-OLED |
| -- | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s global score of 79.2. The LG V35 ThinQ has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots much better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way better video definition and a way better resolution back camera.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a very superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 42 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.