Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | P-OLED |
| -- | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having an 81.2 score against 79.2. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. The LG V40 ThinQ features an extremely better CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
LG V40 ThinQ features a lot better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way better resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 42 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.