Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| -- | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | P-OLED |
| -- | 395 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s general score of 79.2. LG Velvet counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen. LG Velvet features a really superior processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures a bit better photographs and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a higher resolution camera in the back. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a little bit better storage capacity to install games and applications than LG Velvet, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 9% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.