Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-07-29 |
| -- | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| -- | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | -- |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is a little bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having a overall score of 80.8 against 79.2. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia XR20 has an older 11 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Nokia XR20 counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Nokia XR20 has an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has much worse brightness and a quite smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia XR20, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with just a little better battery life than Nokia XR20, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 4630mAh. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures much clearer videos and photos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a lot better video definition and a higher 50 megapixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.