Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-09-02 |
| -- | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | AMOLED |
| -- | 385 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a general score of 79.2, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's general score of 76.2. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a newer 15 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a extremely newer device, and it's also noticeably thinner and just a little lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5S.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a lot better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display and much worse brightness.
Nubia Red Magic 5S takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has slower 15 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 7680x4320 video quality, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a much better 64 megapixels resolution back camera.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a little longer battery performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 4 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.