Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 14 |
| 2025-04-24 | -- |
| -- | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| -- | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 385 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than the Galaxy A16 5G, getting a 79.2 score against 76.2. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) body is just a bit lighter and much thinner than the Galaxy A16 5G. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a more recent 15 version and Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version, providing the user a lot of extra features.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a much better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has much darker screen and a little bit smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy A16 5G. They have a same resolution camera and a same size diafragm aperture. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a greater memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A16 5G counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.