Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-07-02 |
| -- | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 274 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a score of 79.2, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A22's 76.1 overall score. Even though Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A22, it's thinner and also a lot newer. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has 15 version while Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12.
The Galaxy A22 has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen. Galaxy A22 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 12 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with a higher resolution.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A22, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.