Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-06-24 |
| -- | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| -- | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| -- | 399 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G is a little bit better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having a global score of 84.6 against 79.2. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy A22 5G has older 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a way better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a more megapixels camera and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A22 5G has just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.