Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 14 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2023-12-11 |
| -- | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a 79.9 score against 79.2. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A25 5G has the older 14 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display and much lower brightness. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a bit better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and a back-facing camera with a 50 mega-pixels, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a better memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.