Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-02-25 |
| -- | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | -- |
| -- | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 411 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a global score of 82, which is a bit better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s general score of 79.2. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A32 LTE Only has older 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a much sharper screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display and way darker screen.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a way better performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a way worse resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality. Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.