Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-04-10 |
| -- | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.9 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 437 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A40 is a little bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with a score of 79.6 against 79.2. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Galaxy A40 has 11 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy A40 features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display.
The Galaxy A40 features a lot better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a back camera with a way better 50 MP resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a superior battery performance than Galaxy A40, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.