Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 431 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 is a bit better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting an 81.7 score against 79.2. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A41 has older 11 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display.
Galaxy A41 counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A41, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with a better resolution.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy A41, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A41, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.